<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407877</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that if the additions forming the basis for the penalty are deleted, the penalty cannot be sustained. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the significance of a valid basis for imposing penalties and the relevance of established case law in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 08:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 756 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407877</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that if the additions forming the basis for the penalty are deleted, the penalty cannot be sustained. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the significance of a valid basis for imposing penalties and the relevance of established case law in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>