<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by Revenue, affirming the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by CIT(A) based on the lack of conclusive evidence proving the purchases as bogus and the presence of doubt regarding the same.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 08:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 749 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by Revenue, affirming the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by CIT(A) based on the lack of conclusive evidence proving the purchases as bogus and the presence of doubt regarding the same.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>