<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 748 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to use PBDIT as the profit level indicator for determining the ALP of international transactions. It emphasized the need for adjustments in depreciation and rejected the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning equating depreciation with repair and maintenance expenses. The order was pronounced on 24/03/2021 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 748 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to use PBDIT as the profit level indicator for determining the ALP of international transactions. It emphasized the need for adjustments in depreciation and rejected the CIT (A)&#039;s reasoning equating depreciation with repair and maintenance expenses. The order was pronounced on 24/03/2021 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>