<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1944, by invoking the provisions of Section 80 based on previous Tribunal orders and the appellant&#039;s compliance with the law after its clarification by the Bombay High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 08:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1944, by invoking the provisions of Section 80 based on previous Tribunal orders and the appellant&#039;s compliance with the law after its clarification by the Bombay High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>