https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295210 Nazul land allotment rules were interpreted as regulating eligible categories and pre-determined rates, not as incorporating the entire 1961 allotment scheme or its eligibility conditions as binding statutory norms. On that footing, the later office order operated only on the administrative scheme and did not amount to an amendment of the statutory rules. The administrative order dated 03.04.1986 was therefore valid, and the respondents could not claim relief on the basis that the 1961 Scheme had become immutable under the Nazul Land Rules. The appeals succeeded and the High Court's order was set aside. en-us Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 May 2021 17:01:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295210 Nazul land allotment rules were interpreted as regulating eligible categories and pre-determined rates, not as incorporating the entire 1961 allotment scheme or its eligibility conditions as binding statutory norms. On that footing, the later office order operated only on the administrative scheme and did not amount to an amendment of the statutory rules. The administrative order dated 03.04.1986 was therefore valid, and the respondents could not claim relief on the basis that the 1961 Scheme had become immutable under the Nazul Land Rules. The appeals succeeded and the High Court's order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295210