<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes IGST on Oxygen Concentrators Imported as Gifts, Citing Article 14 Violation and Unconstitutional Tax Burden.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58089</link>
    <description>Levy of IGST on oxygen concentrators - right to health and affordable treatment - Whether the State&#039;s action, of imposing IGST on oxygen concentrators, which were directly imported by individuals, albeit free of cost, without the aid of a canalising agency runs afoul of Article 14 of the Constitution? - The exclusion of individuals, such as the petitioner, from the benefits of the 03.05.2021 notification only because they chose to receive the oxygen concentrators as a gift, albeit directly, without going through a canalizing agency is, in our opinion, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution - The imposition of IGST on oxygen concentrators which are imported by individuals and are received by them as gifts [i.e. free of cost] for personal use, is unconstitutional - the declaration notification no. 30/2021 dated 01.05.2021 is quashed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 15:57:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 15:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=645001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes IGST on Oxygen Concentrators Imported as Gifts, Citing Article 14 Violation and Unconstitutional Tax Burden.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58089</link>
      <description>Levy of IGST on oxygen concentrators - right to health and affordable treatment - Whether the State&#039;s action, of imposing IGST on oxygen concentrators, which were directly imported by individuals, albeit free of cost, without the aid of a canalising agency runs afoul of Article 14 of the Constitution? - The exclusion of individuals, such as the petitioner, from the benefits of the 03.05.2021 notification only because they chose to receive the oxygen concentrators as a gift, albeit directly, without going through a canalizing agency is, in our opinion, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution - The imposition of IGST on oxygen concentrators which are imported by individuals and are received by them as gifts [i.e. free of cost] for personal use, is unconstitutional - the declaration notification no. 30/2021 dated 01.05.2021 is quashed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 15:57:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>