<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Reviews Insolvency Process Validity for Personal Guarantors under November 15, 2019, Central Government Notification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58086</link>
    <description>Insolvency proceedings against the Personal Guarantors - Vires and validity of a notification dated 15.11.2019 issued by the Central Government - It is clear that Parliamentary intent was to treat personal guarantors differently from other categories of individuals. The intimate connection between such individuals and corporate entities to whom they stood guarantee, as well as the possibility of two separate processes being carried on in different forums, with its attendant uncertain outcomes, led to carving out personal guarantors as a separate species of individuals, for whom the Adjudicating authority was common with the corporate debtor to whom they had stood guarantee. The fact that the process of insolvency in Part III is to be applie.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 13:31:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 13:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Reviews Insolvency Process Validity for Personal Guarantors under November 15, 2019, Central Government Notification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58086</link>
      <description>Insolvency proceedings against the Personal Guarantors - Vires and validity of a notification dated 15.11.2019 issued by the Central Government - It is clear that Parliamentary intent was to treat personal guarantors differently from other categories of individuals. The intimate connection between such individuals and corporate entities to whom they stood guarantee, as well as the possibility of two separate processes being carried on in different forums, with its attendant uncertain outcomes, led to carving out personal guarantors as a separate species of individuals, for whom the Adjudicating authority was common with the corporate debtor to whom they had stood guarantee. The fact that the process of insolvency in Part III is to be applie.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 13:31:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>