<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 712 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407833</link>
    <description>A resolution applicant may withdraw a plan before tribunal approval where materially inaccurate or incomplete disclosures in the information memorandum undermine the plan&#039;s feasibility and commercial viability, especially where the applicant reserved a contractual right to withdraw on adverse change. On the facts, a discrepancy concerning land and generation capacity, including an additional essential land parcel, made the plan commercially unsafe, so withdrawal was permitted. The earnest money deposit and performance bank guarantee were not forfeited in full; the tribunal ordered only partial forfeiture and refund of the balance, balancing process consequences against the applicant&#039;s withdrawal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 712 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407833</link>
      <description>A resolution applicant may withdraw a plan before tribunal approval where materially inaccurate or incomplete disclosures in the information memorandum undermine the plan&#039;s feasibility and commercial viability, especially where the applicant reserved a contractual right to withdraw on adverse change. On the facts, a discrepancy concerning land and generation capacity, including an additional essential land parcel, made the plan commercially unsafe, so withdrawal was permitted. The earnest money deposit and performance bank guarantee were not forfeited in full; the tribunal ordered only partial forfeiture and refund of the balance, balancing process consequences against the applicant&#039;s withdrawal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>