<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 53 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25492</link>
    <description>The court upheld the inclusion of the subsidy received by the assessee as income, favoring the Revenue. The reassessment under section 147(b) was deemed valid, emphasizing that the Income-tax Officer acted within jurisdiction based on valid information despite opinions in a circular. The court directed parties to bear their own costs and forwarded the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 53 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25492</link>
      <description>The court upheld the inclusion of the subsidy received by the assessee as income, favoring the Revenue. The reassessment under section 147(b) was deemed valid, emphasizing that the Income-tax Officer acted within jurisdiction based on valid information despite opinions in a circular. The court directed parties to bear their own costs and forwarded the judgment to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>