<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 698 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407819</link>
    <description>Codeine-based cough syrup may fall within the NDPS regime as a manufactured drug or essential narcotic drug when its possession or transport is not shown to be for therapeutic use, and the stated dosage-based exemption will not apply without supporting documents. The material and rules governing essential narcotic drugs regulate possession and transport within the prescribed framework. For bail under the NDPS Act, the Court noted that a co-accused&#039;s memorandum and call detail records, without independent incriminating recovery from the applicant, were insufficient to satisfy the Section 37 bar. On that material, the applicant was found entitled to bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2021 08:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 698 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407819</link>
      <description>Codeine-based cough syrup may fall within the NDPS regime as a manufactured drug or essential narcotic drug when its possession or transport is not shown to be for therapeutic use, and the stated dosage-based exemption will not apply without supporting documents. The material and rules governing essential narcotic drugs regulate possession and transport within the prescribed framework. For bail under the NDPS Act, the Court noted that a co-accused&#039;s memorandum and call detail records, without independent incriminating recovery from the applicant, were insufficient to satisfy the Section 37 bar. On that material, the applicant was found entitled to bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>