<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 688 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407809</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition made under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and independent inquiry in such cases. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, stressing the necessity for proper verification and substantiation of claims by tax authorities to ensure fair assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2021 08:25:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 688 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407809</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the addition made under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and independent inquiry in such cases. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, stressing the necessity for proper verification and substantiation of claims by tax authorities to ensure fair assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>