https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407802 A restoration application under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was found not maintainable where an earlier identical restoration appeal had already been dismissed for non-prosecution and the applicant suppressed material facts relevant to maintainability. The Tribunal held that the proceeding could not be treated as a fresh application under Order VII Rule 13 or Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The record also reflected the company's prior striking off and related connected proceedings, which reinforced the disclosure deficiencies. The restoration request was therefore rejected. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407802 A restoration application under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was found not maintainable where an earlier identical restoration appeal had already been dismissed for non-prosecution and the applicant suppressed material facts relevant to maintainability. The Tribunal held that the proceeding could not be treated as a fresh application under Order VII Rule 13 or Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The record also reflected the company's prior striking off and related connected proceedings, which reinforced the disclosure deficiencies. The restoration request was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407802