<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1854 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the reopening of the assessment was invalid due to procedural errors in recording and communicating the reasons for reopening. The reassessment process was deemed vitiated by significant procedural lapses, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of strict adherence to procedural requirements for ensuring the validity of reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2021 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1854 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the reopening of the assessment was invalid due to procedural errors in recording and communicating the reasons for reopening. The reassessment process was deemed vitiated by significant procedural lapses, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of strict adherence to procedural requirements for ensuring the validity of reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>