https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295184 In a grossly delayed housing project, a one-sided clause limiting compensation for delayed possession did not prevent a consumer forum from awarding just and reasonable compensation beyond the contract rate. Execution of a conveyance deed did not, by itself, waive the purchaser's claim for deficiency in service, though purchasers who entered specific settlements and transferees of rights were excluded from relief. Where the brochure and contract promised wider township amenities, failure to provide them justified compensation, but no breach was proved regarding the club house. Contractually disclosed tax-related interest, electricity charges and parking charges were recoverable, so challenges to those demands failed. en-us Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Aug 2022 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295184 In a grossly delayed housing project, a one-sided clause limiting compensation for delayed possession did not prevent a consumer forum from awarding just and reasonable compensation beyond the contract rate. Execution of a conveyance deed did not, by itself, waive the purchaser's claim for deficiency in service, though purchasers who entered specific settlements and transferees of rights were excluded from relief. Where the brochure and contract promised wider township amenities, failure to provide them justified compensation, but no breach was proved regarding the club house. Contractually disclosed tax-related interest, electricity charges and parking charges were recoverable, so challenges to those demands failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295184