<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295165</link>
    <description>Inherent powers may be used in very exceptional circumstances to grant a narrow extension of time for payment of fine or compensation, so long as the conviction and sentence remain intact and the revisional order is not substantively altered. However, those powers cannot be used to accept a post-revisional composition between the accused and the complainant, because that would effectively undo or reopen a final revisional order barred from review. The stated principle is that inherent jurisdiction can secure the ends of justice without defeating the statutory prohibition against alteration of a final judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 10:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295165</link>
      <description>Inherent powers may be used in very exceptional circumstances to grant a narrow extension of time for payment of fine or compensation, so long as the conviction and sentence remain intact and the revisional order is not substantively altered. However, those powers cannot be used to accept a post-revisional composition between the accused and the complainant, because that would effectively undo or reopen a final revisional order barred from review. The stated principle is that inherent jurisdiction can secure the ends of justice without defeating the statutory prohibition against alteration of a final judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>