<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 675 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407796</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery where the writ petition challenged rejection of a request for special rate fixation on delay grounds and the related demand-cum-recovery notice. The HC found that further hearing was required and, pending that consideration, stayed the operation of the impugned rejection order as well as the recovery notice. Notice was directed to be issued, and the petitioner was protected until further order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 675 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407796</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery where the writ petition challenged rejection of a request for special rate fixation on delay grounds and the related demand-cum-recovery notice. The HC found that further hearing was required and, pending that consideration, stayed the operation of the impugned rejection order as well as the recovery notice. Notice was directed to be issued, and the petitioner was protected until further order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>