<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 665 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407786</link>
    <description>Paragraph 6.8(a) of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 was read broadly to permit DTA sale of any product manufactured by an EOU producing more than one product, up to 90% of the FOB value of export of the specific products and within the overall 50% ceiling. Twisted yarn and rope were treated as similar goods because they belonged to the same broad product class, shared characteristics, composition and use, and were supported by the Development Commissioner&#039;s product grouping. On limitation, regular intimations and returns, together with departmental awareness of the clearances, negatived suppression or misdeclaration, so the extended period could not be invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 665 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407786</link>
      <description>Paragraph 6.8(a) of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-14 was read broadly to permit DTA sale of any product manufactured by an EOU producing more than one product, up to 90% of the FOB value of export of the specific products and within the overall 50% ceiling. Twisted yarn and rope were treated as similar goods because they belonged to the same broad product class, shared characteristics, composition and use, and were supported by the Development Commissioner&#039;s product grouping. On limitation, regular intimations and returns, together with departmental awareness of the clearances, negatived suppression or misdeclaration, so the extended period could not be invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>