<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 660 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment for AY 2007-08. The AO&#039;s reasons for reopening were found to be incorrect and non-existent, leading to the deletion of all additions made during reassessment. Other issues, including the addition under Section 68 and determination of net profit rate, were not separately addressed due to the primary ground of the invalid reopening being upheld, rendering them academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 660 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of the assessment for AY 2007-08. The AO&#039;s reasons for reopening were found to be incorrect and non-existent, leading to the deletion of all additions made during reassessment. Other issues, including the addition under Section 68 and determination of net profit rate, were not separately addressed due to the primary ground of the invalid reopening being upheld, rendering them academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>