<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 658 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the addition of Rs. 2,86,01,036/- due to low Gross Profit and the disallowance of Rs. 9,12,600/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It was concluded that the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the additions and disallowances, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 658 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the addition of Rs. 2,86,01,036/- due to low Gross Profit and the disallowance of Rs. 9,12,600/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It was concluded that the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the additions and disallowances, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>