<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1229 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295161</link>
    <description>Parity with similarly situated co-accused, completion of investigation through filing of the charge-sheet, and prolonged judicial custody supported release on bail. The Court noted that other accused placed similarly had already been granted bail and that the petitioner had remained in custody for about 11 months. On those facts, it extended the benefit of bail to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 08:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1229 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295161</link>
      <description>Parity with similarly situated co-accused, completion of investigation through filing of the charge-sheet, and prolonged judicial custody supported release on bail. The Court noted that other accused placed similarly had already been granted bail and that the petitioner had remained in custody for about 11 months. On those facts, it extended the benefit of bail to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>