https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295162 After cognizance, remand of an accused already before the court lies under Section 309(2) CrPC, not Section 167; the remand order was nevertheless valid on that basis. Re-registration of the FIR by the NIA to implement a statutory transfer of investigation was not treated as a prohibited second FIR, and further investigation under Section 173(8) remained permissible even after filing of the charge-sheet and cognizance. The addition of graver non-bailable offences did not automatically require prior cancellation of earlier bail in every case, because the court could direct custody and the accused could seek fresh bail for the new offences. On these facts, the custody and investigation steps were upheld. en-us Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 May 2021 08:28:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295162 After cognizance, remand of an accused already before the court lies under Section 309(2) CrPC, not Section 167; the remand order was nevertheless valid on that basis. Re-registration of the FIR by the NIA to implement a statutory transfer of investigation was not treated as a prohibited second FIR, and further investigation under Section 173(8) remained permissible even after filing of the charge-sheet and cognizance. The addition of graver non-bailable offences did not automatically require prior cancellation of earlier bail in every case, because the court could direct custody and the accused could seek fresh bail for the new offences. On these facts, the custody and investigation steps were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295162