https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295144 A dispute over alleged overlap between adjoining mining leases requires fresh demarcation and proper identification of boundaries, especially where the record does not reliably show how the overlap was determined. The commentary states that confusion about large lease areas cannot be resolved by assumption or incomplete material such as a missing demarcation report. It also notes that a pending civil suit, by itself, does not justify stopping mining operations unless supported by a civil court injunction, and that any interim restraint should not continue indefinitely in place of a final administrative determination after hearing both sides. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2021 18:49:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295144 A dispute over alleged overlap between adjoining mining leases requires fresh demarcation and proper identification of boundaries, especially where the record does not reliably show how the overlap was determined. The commentary states that confusion about large lease areas cannot be resolved by assumption or incomplete material such as a missing demarcation report. It also notes that a pending civil suit, by itself, does not justify stopping mining operations unless supported by a civil court injunction, and that any interim restraint should not continue indefinitely in place of a final administrative determination after hearing both sides. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295144