https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295143 The Court upheld the authority of the Commission to modify punishments under Regulation 8, emphasizing that the power to approve or disapprove implicitly includes the power to modify. It highlighted that the Court should not presume an act is prohibited unless expressly stated and cannot interfere with findings of fact unless based on no material or perverse. The Court found no basis for interference with the Commission's order inflicting punishment, dismissing the application and writ petition without costs. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2021 15:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295143 The Court upheld the authority of the Commission to modify punishments under Regulation 8, emphasizing that the power to approve or disapprove implicitly includes the power to modify. It highlighted that the Court should not presume an act is prohibited unless expressly stated and cannot interfere with findings of fact unless based on no material or perverse. The Court found no basis for interference with the Commission's order inflicting punishment, dismissing the application and writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295143