https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295135 Promissory estoppel was held unavailable where the alleged policy statements and circulars were only provisional, no clear and definite representation inducing a change of position was shown, and the plaintiffs' own conduct in remaining in possession while not meeting rent obligations undermined equitable relief. Interim protection against eviction was continued only conditionally, requiring deposit of arrears and future rent at the rates indicated with interest within the stipulated time. On the pricing dispute, the civil court's jurisdiction was prima facie not barred. The earlier interim orders were therefore modified, with continued protection made dependent on compliance with payment directions. en-us Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2021 14:41:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295135 Promissory estoppel was held unavailable where the alleged policy statements and circulars were only provisional, no clear and definite representation inducing a change of position was shown, and the plaintiffs' own conduct in remaining in possession while not meeting rent obligations undermined equitable relief. Interim protection against eviction was continued only conditionally, requiring deposit of arrears and future rent at the rates indicated with interest within the stipulated time. On the pricing dispute, the civil court's jurisdiction was prima facie not barred. The earlier interim orders were therefore modified, with continued protection made dependent on compliance with payment directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295135