<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules ICAI Exam Committee&#039;s Actions Arbitrary, Violating Article 19(1)(a) Rights; March 2021 Decision Unlawful.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58040</link>
    <description>Seeking to review holding of examinations and declaring results by the ICAI - Allegation of Oppressive action of a professional body-ICAI - if it treats any suggestion for improvement as a challenge to its authority or supremacy is a State, that disregards rather violates fundamental rights of a citizens guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of our Constitution - this Court has no hesitation in holding that the action of the Examination Committee was without jurisdiction; proceedings conducted by it were arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and their culmination in the form of decision dated 9/10.3.2021 has been contrary to law. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 10:27:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 10:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules ICAI Exam Committee&#039;s Actions Arbitrary, Violating Article 19(1)(a) Rights; March 2021 Decision Unlawful.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58040</link>
      <description>Seeking to review holding of examinations and declaring results by the ICAI - Allegation of Oppressive action of a professional body-ICAI - if it treats any suggestion for improvement as a challenge to its authority or supremacy is a State, that disregards rather violates fundamental rights of a citizens guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of our Constitution - this Court has no hesitation in holding that the action of the Examination Committee was without jurisdiction; proceedings conducted by it were arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and their culmination in the form of decision dated 9/10.3.2021 has been contrary to law. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 10:27:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>