<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 621 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407742</link>
    <description>The court closed the writ petition challenging summons served on the petitioner post-expiry date, as no criminal prosecution had been initiated. Emphasizing compliance with legal provisions, the court highlighted the need for adherence to statutory requirements under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act for any future actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 621 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407742</link>
      <description>The court closed the writ petition challenging summons served on the petitioner post-expiry date, as no criminal prosecution had been initiated. Emphasizing compliance with legal provisions, the court highlighted the need for adherence to statutory requirements under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act for any future actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>