<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 606 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Viscose Rayon Filament Yarn, regarding the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on lead and related articles. The appellant successfully argued that the disputed items were essential for the repair and maintenance of machinery, qualifying as &#039;capital goods&#039; necessary for the manufacturing process. Citing legal precedents, including decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Rajasthan High Court and Tribunal judgments, the Tribunal held that goods crucial for machinery upkeep and maintenance are eligible for credit. As a result, the appeal was granted in favor of the appellant, with relief from Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 08:29:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 606 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Viscose Rayon Filament Yarn, regarding the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on lead and related articles. The appellant successfully argued that the disputed items were essential for the repair and maintenance of machinery, qualifying as &#039;capital goods&#039; necessary for the manufacturing process. Citing legal precedents, including decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Rajasthan High Court and Tribunal judgments, the Tribunal held that goods crucial for machinery upkeep and maintenance are eligible for credit. As a result, the appeal was granted in favor of the appellant, with relief from Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>