https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295126 The Tribunal upheld the decision rejecting refund claims for October and November 2008 as the appellant did not challenge the original rejection before the Commissioner (Appeals), making the first adjudication final. Despite four refund claims being allowed, the failure to appeal the rejection of the remaining two claims led to their rejection based on the finality of the adjudication order, as supported by a Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the rejection of the claims and denying the entitlement to refunds for the unchallenged claims. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2021 08:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295126 The Tribunal upheld the decision rejecting refund claims for October and November 2008 as the appellant did not challenge the original rejection before the Commissioner (Appeals), making the first adjudication final. Despite four refund claims being allowed, the failure to appeal the rejection of the remaining two claims led to their rejection based on the finality of the adjudication order, as supported by a Supreme Court decision. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the rejection of the claims and denying the entitlement to refunds for the unchallenged claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295126