https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295131 The SC held that for default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC, a police report filed within the statutory period is sufficient if it contains the particulars required by Section 173(2). The later filing or absence of supporting documents does not render the report incomplete, because Section 173(5) is directory and additional material may be produced later with the court's permission. Since the report was filed on time and cognizance was taken the same day, the right to default bail did not arise or revive. The appellant was therefore not entitled to default bail. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 May 2021 08:28:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295131 The SC held that for default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC, a police report filed within the statutory period is sufficient if it contains the particulars required by Section 173(2). The later filing or absence of supporting documents does not render the report incomplete, because Section 173(5) is directory and additional material may be produced later with the court's permission. Since the report was filed on time and cognizance was taken the same day, the right to default bail did not arise or revive. The appellant was therefore not entitled to default bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295131