<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 83 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25469</link>
    <description>The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an income tax case regarding the validity of a partnership deed involving minors. The Court held that guardian consent is essential for partnership validity, emphasizing it can be shown through various means beyond direct signatures. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not considering alternative evidence of consent and instructed a review of additional evidence. The judgment highlights the significance of proving guardian consent in partnership agreements through diverse evidence forms, not solely relying on signatures, and directed the Tribunal to reassess based on new information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 83 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25469</link>
      <description>The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an income tax case regarding the validity of a partnership deed involving minors. The Court held that guardian consent is essential for partnership validity, emphasizing it can be shown through various means beyond direct signatures. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not considering alternative evidence of consent and instructed a review of additional evidence. The judgment highlights the significance of proving guardian consent in partnership agreements through diverse evidence forms, not solely relying on signatures, and directed the Tribunal to reassess based on new information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>