<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 567 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the capital gain from the asset transfer should be treated as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) instead of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG). The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s possession and rights in the property since 1993, concluding that the gain qualified as LTCG due to the extended holding period, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed, and the order was issued on 22/10/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 567 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the capital gain from the asset transfer should be treated as Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) instead of Short Term Capital Gain (STCG). The Tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s possession and rights in the property since 1993, concluding that the gain qualified as LTCG due to the extended holding period, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The appeal was allowed, and the order was issued on 22/10/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>