<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1809 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Bagasse is classified as waste and not subject to duty under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision aligned with previous judgments by the High Court and Supreme Court, establishing Bagasse as a residue with nil duty rate. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowed the appeal, providing consequential benefits to the appellant based on established legal principles and interpretations by higher courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 08:37:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1809 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Bagasse is classified as waste and not subject to duty under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision aligned with previous judgments by the High Court and Supreme Court, establishing Bagasse as a residue with nil duty rate. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowed the appeal, providing consequential benefits to the appellant based on established legal principles and interpretations by higher courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>