https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295090 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a five-star hotel, by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 for non-payment of service tax on renting of immovable property. The Tribunal recognized the contentious nature of the tax liability and relied on precedents, such as R.K. Refreshment & Enterprises and Sree Kanyacombines, to justify waiving the penalty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing the appellant with relief and consequential benefits. en-us Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295090 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a five-star hotel, by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 for non-payment of service tax on renting of immovable property. The Tribunal recognized the contentious nature of the tax liability and relied on precedents, such as R.K. Refreshment & Enterprises and Sree Kanyacombines, to justify waiving the penalty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing the appellant with relief and consequential benefits. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295090