https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295110 The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the availability of a revision remedy does not, by itself, bar invocation of the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. The non-obstante language of Section 482 preserves the High Court's power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and that jurisdiction is not excluded merely because a revisional remedy exists. A contrary view would unduly narrow the scope of Section 482. The High Court's order was therefore liable to be set aside. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 May 2021 08:37:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295110 The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the availability of a revision remedy does not, by itself, bar invocation of the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. The non-obstante language of Section 482 preserves the High Court's power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and that jurisdiction is not excluded merely because a revisional remedy exists. A contrary view would unduly narrow the scope of Section 482. The High Court's order was therefore liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295110