https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295085 The court quashed the criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the petitioner had successfully demonstrated abuse of process of court. The court noted discrepancies in the complaint and supporting documents, concluding that the petitioner rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. As a result, the criminal proceedings were quashed, and the related case for specific performance of contract was closed. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 17:01:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295085 The court quashed the criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that the petitioner had successfully demonstrated abuse of process of court. The court noted discrepancies in the complaint and supporting documents, concluding that the petitioner rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Act. As a result, the criminal proceedings were quashed, and the related case for specific performance of contract was closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295085