https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295084 The Court clarified that where the requirement of sanction under Section 197 CrPC is in issue, further trial proceedings should remain in abeyance until that threshold question is decided, because proceeding meanwhile could prejudice the accused's liberty. It also clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC should not ordinarily end merely on production before the regular court; it may continue until the regular court decides the bail application, and for a short further period to enable recourse to a higher court. The order therefore kept the trial proceedings stayed pending the sanction question and extended anticipatory bail accordingly. en-us Sun, 13 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 16:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295084 The Court clarified that where the requirement of sanction under Section 197 CrPC is in issue, further trial proceedings should remain in abeyance until that threshold question is decided, because proceeding meanwhile could prejudice the accused's liberty. It also clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC should not ordinarily end merely on production before the regular court; it may continue until the regular court decides the bail application, and for a short further period to enable recourse to a higher court. The order therefore kept the trial proceedings stayed pending the sanction question and extended anticipatory bail accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 13 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295084