https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295080 The CrPC confers concurrent jurisdiction on the High Court and the Court of Session for revision and anticipatory bail, so an applicant may choose either forum directly. A High Court rule or practice cannot require prior recourse to the Sessions Court where the statute does not impose that condition. In revisional matters, the statutory bar applies only to successive approaches to both forums, not to an initial choice of the High Court. In anticipatory bail matters under Section 438, direct application to the High Court remains available, and a prior rejection by the Sessions Court does not bar it. en-us Fri, 23 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295080 The CrPC confers concurrent jurisdiction on the High Court and the Court of Session for revision and anticipatory bail, so an applicant may choose either forum directly. A High Court rule or practice cannot require prior recourse to the Sessions Court where the statute does not impose that condition. In revisional matters, the statutory bar applies only to successive approaches to both forums, not to an initial choice of the High Court. In anticipatory bail matters under Section 438, direct application to the High Court remains available, and a prior rejection by the Sessions Court does not bar it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295080