https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295079 The court held that an applicant seeking bail has the right to choose between approaching the High Court or the Court of Sessions under Sections 438 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The imposed restrictions on filing bail applications directly in the High Court were deemed unnecessary and against statutory provisions, emphasizing the importance of protecting personal liberty and ensuring access to justice without undue constraints. The matter was referred back to the Single Judge for further proceedings. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 14:38:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295079 The court held that an applicant seeking bail has the right to choose between approaching the High Court or the Court of Sessions under Sections 438 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The imposed restrictions on filing bail applications directly in the High Court were deemed unnecessary and against statutory provisions, emphasizing the importance of protecting personal liberty and ensuring access to justice without undue constraints. The matter was referred back to the Single Judge for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295079