<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Can&#039;t Challenge Officer&#039;s ALP Ruling; MAP Margins to Apply to Non-USA Transactions u/s 92CA.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58016</link>
    <description>Enhancement u/s 92CA - “MAP” margin - the Revenue fails to dispute that even the Transfer Pricing Officer has not drawn any distinction qua the “ALP” in all the substantive grounds raised herein. We thus hold that the “MAP” margin of 15.49%, 15.34% and 15.76% deserves to be applied qua the remaining portion of non-USA based international transactions as well. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 13:08:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 13:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Can&#039;t Challenge Officer&#039;s ALP Ruling; MAP Margins to Apply to Non-USA Transactions u/s 92CA.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58016</link>
      <description>Enhancement u/s 92CA - “MAP” margin - the Revenue fails to dispute that even the Transfer Pricing Officer has not drawn any distinction qua the “ALP” in all the substantive grounds raised herein. We thus hold that the “MAP” margin of 15.49%, 15.34% and 15.76% deserves to be applied qua the remaining portion of non-USA based international transactions as well. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 13:08:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>