<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Operational Creditor&#039;s CIRP Bid Faces Challenges Over Unproven Debt and Default for 2016-2017 Packing Materials.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58009</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP - The nature of goods being perishable commodity, slightest delay shall cause huge loss. - The &#039;debt&#039; as claimed by Operational Creditor is towards carton boxes and other packing material supplied by Operational Creditor along with purchase orders of the year 2016-2017. The packing materials are also perishable. Further, the onus of, who has to take back the unused materials, whether the same is adjusted towards payment are not clear. - The applicant has failed to quantify the alleged &#039;debt&#039; and the &#039;date of default&#039;. Neither &quot;debt&quot; nor &quot;default&quot; is proved - Tri</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 12:40:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 12:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Operational Creditor&#039;s CIRP Bid Faces Challenges Over Unproven Debt and Default for 2016-2017 Packing Materials.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58009</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP - The nature of goods being perishable commodity, slightest delay shall cause huge loss. - The &#039;debt&#039; as claimed by Operational Creditor is towards carton boxes and other packing material supplied by Operational Creditor along with purchase orders of the year 2016-2017. The packing materials are also perishable. Further, the onus of, who has to take back the unused materials, whether the same is adjusted towards payment are not clear. - The applicant has failed to quantify the alleged &#039;debt&#039; and the &#039;date of default&#039;. Neither &quot;debt&quot; nor &quot;default&quot; is proved - Tri</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 12:40:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>