https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295077 The Court quashed the order of the High Court and the complaint filed by the complainant, setting aside the order of the Judicial Magistrate taking cognizance of offenses under Sections 406, 419, 420, and 120B of the IPC. The appeal was allowed as the Court found no prima facie case against the appellants, emphasizing that the dispute was civil in nature and did not give rise to criminal liability. The Court held that the cognizance taken by the Magistrate was an abuse of the court process. en-us Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 11:39:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295077 The Court quashed the order of the High Court and the complaint filed by the complainant, setting aside the order of the Judicial Magistrate taking cognizance of offenses under Sections 406, 419, 420, and 120B of the IPC. The appeal was allowed as the Court found no prima facie case against the appellants, emphasizing that the dispute was civil in nature and did not give rise to criminal liability. The Court held that the cognizance taken by the Magistrate was an abuse of the court process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295077