<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 561 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407682</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned Revision of Assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for work contractors. The court emphasized that the orders were passed without new facts or materials, solely on a change of opinion, and lacked a detailed intra-department enquiry following a web report. The imposition of penalties separately under the TNVAT Act was set aside, highlighting that penalties must be part of the assessment order. Additionally, the court ruled against levying purchase tax on the contractors, stating they should not be burdened further. The matter was remitted for fresh orders in compliance with the law, with no costs imposed on the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 561 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407682</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned Revision of Assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for work contractors. The court emphasized that the orders were passed without new facts or materials, solely on a change of opinion, and lacked a detailed intra-department enquiry following a web report. The imposition of penalties separately under the TNVAT Act was set aside, highlighting that penalties must be part of the assessment order. Additionally, the court ruled against levying purchase tax on the contractors, stating they should not be burdened further. The matter was remitted for fresh orders in compliance with the law, with no costs imposed on the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>