<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 557 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407678</link>
    <description>The HC issued a notice to the respondents and stayed proceedings related to impugned notices based on Notification No.54/2018&#039;s retrospective application. The petitioners contested the retrospective effect of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, arguing it violates Article 14. The Court will address these concerns in the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 557 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407678</link>
      <description>The HC issued a notice to the respondents and stayed proceedings related to impugned notices based on Notification No.54/2018&#039;s retrospective application. The petitioners contested the retrospective effect of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, arguing it violates Article 14. The Court will address these concerns in the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>