<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 547 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that twin satisfactions are not mandatory under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act when the Assessing Officer is common for both the searched person and the other person. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and remanding the case for fresh adjudication on merits. The CIT(A) was directed to provide the appellant with three effective opportunities of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 547 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that twin satisfactions are not mandatory under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act when the Assessing Officer is common for both the searched person and the other person. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and remanding the case for fresh adjudication on merits. The CIT(A) was directed to provide the appellant with three effective opportunities of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>