<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and ruling that manufacturers under the compound levy scheme are liable to pay education cess in addition to the rate fixed under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and ruling that manufacturers under the compound levy scheme are liable to pay education cess in addition to the rate fixed under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>