<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving manufacturing without Central Excise registration and duty demand calculation. The matter was remanded for reevaluation, as the appellant&#039;s charts and defenses were not properly considered during adjudication. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to pass a new order based on the appellant&#039;s contentions and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving manufacturing without Central Excise registration and duty demand calculation. The matter was remanded for reevaluation, as the appellant&#039;s charts and defenses were not properly considered during adjudication. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to pass a new order based on the appellant&#039;s contentions and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>