<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1871 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295069</link>
    <description>The court granted the application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, quashing the criminal case against the applicant due to lack of evidence of his direct involvement in the alleged offenses. The judgment emphasized the importance of active participation and statutory provisions for vicarious liability, setting a legal precedent specific to the applicant&#039;s non-executive director role.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1871 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295069</link>
      <description>The court granted the application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, quashing the criminal case against the applicant due to lack of evidence of his direct involvement in the alleged offenses. The judgment emphasized the importance of active participation and statutory provisions for vicarious liability, setting a legal precedent specific to the applicant&#039;s non-executive director role.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>