<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1888 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295067</link>
    <description>The court quashed Criminal Complaint No. 43307 of 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the Company was not impleaded as an accused, rendering the complaint not maintainable under Section 141 of the Act. The court found the Company was in existence when the cheques were issued and at the time of the complaint filing. Respondent No. 2 was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000/- to the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1888 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295067</link>
      <description>The court quashed Criminal Complaint No. 43307 of 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the Company was not impleaded as an accused, rendering the complaint not maintainable under Section 141 of the Act. The court found the Company was in existence when the cheques were issued and at the time of the complaint filing. Respondent No. 2 was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000/- to the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>