<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1885 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295066</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the Writ petitioners, setting aside penalty orders imposed under the T.N.V.A.T. Act, declaring reassessment based on a change of opinion impermissible, invalidating reassessment proceedings initiated following internal audit objections, and determining that works contractors should not be additionally liable for purchase tax under Section 12 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1885 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295066</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the Writ petitioners, setting aside penalty orders imposed under the T.N.V.A.T. Act, declaring reassessment based on a change of opinion impermissible, invalidating reassessment proceedings initiated following internal audit objections, and determining that works contractors should not be additionally liable for purchase tax under Section 12 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>