<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1418 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295063</link>
    <description>Customisation charges received after delivery of software and after completion of the sale were held not to form part of turnover or sale price under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The statutory concept of sale price was confined to consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods, including sums charged for acts done in respect of the goods at or before delivery. Because the charges related to post-sale customisation services, and the sale proceeds had already been disclosed separately with service tax paid on those charges, they could not be treated as sale consideration. The Revenue&#039;s revisional challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1418 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295063</link>
      <description>Customisation charges received after delivery of software and after completion of the sale were held not to form part of turnover or sale price under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The statutory concept of sale price was confined to consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods, including sums charged for acts done in respect of the goods at or before delivery. Because the charges related to post-sale customisation services, and the sale proceeds had already been disclosed separately with service tax paid on those charges, they could not be treated as sale consideration. The Revenue&#039;s revisional challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>